Plating Powder Coating Buffing Anodizing - Caswell Inc. Metal Finishing Forum  

Go Back   Plating Powder Coating Buffing Anodizing - Caswell Inc. Metal Finishing Forum > Anodizing Questions

Notices

Anodizing Questions Discussion board for anodizing questions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2003, 10:41 PM
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Just North of Hell
Posts: 76
neilfj
Default

I agree, the more options and ideas presented, the better others can design something that suits their situation.

I don't bother agitating any of the other tanks. I really don't see a requirement for it in my situation, but I can see how it would be a benefit if you are doing small items or processing quantities of items. In my situation, for the degreaser, deoxidizer, and dye tanks, I just swish the part around every once in a while. The sealing tank, I don't see a need for it, unless you are using the new room temp sealer. The original sealer requires it be brought to a rolling boil, which provides any movement of the solution that may be required.

Like you said...it works for you and your situation so there is no reason to change it, nor would I recommend it.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2003, 01:41 PM
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 162
NeoMoses
Send a message via AIM to NeoMoses Send a message via Yahoo to NeoMoses
Default

neilfj, can you post some pictures of that pump and/or tell us where you bought it? From the sounds of it, it's very similar to my pumps. Is it a mag-drive pump?

If so, I guess my original idea wasn't too far off, then. I have 2 different types of pumps laying around, one is a submersible only 500 GPH pump, the other is a submersible/inline 700 GPH pump. They are both mag-drive pumps. The 500 GPH has a stainless steel shaft, the 700 has a ceramic shaft. I think I'll give them a try now. I'll probably start off with the 500 GPH pump, as I paid less than $20 for it, so if I kill it, it won't cost me that much.

I'll be using flexible PVC tubing and doing something similar with small holes in it to cause little 'jets' to circulate the electrolyte.

Even though this pump is quite a bit larger than 900 LPH, I think it should scale nicely, as I have a large tank (~ 30 Gallons, with ~15 gallons of electrolyte.)

Thanks guys (and gals if applicable)!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2003, 09:19 AM
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Just North of Hell
Posts: 76
neilfj
Default

Actually, I got the pump from Caswell's to test as part of another project. It is a mag-induction motor. It isn't a product that they carry and it was the only one he had. The test is still being conducted so I can't give out much more information, but I'm hoping to have it completed with the next 1-2 weeks. I think we finally conquered some of the hardware and equipment problems I've been having, at least I'll know for sure when UPS shows up tomorrow with replacements.

The 500 gph pump should be more than suitable for your setup. The Boyu 1300 pump, even though it is rated for 900lph, it has very little pressure (and if your familiar with pumps, it has a max. head height of less than 6'). What you have to be concerned with is the pressure and velocity of your output. The higher the pressure/velocity, the more likely you are to splash the electrolyte. Like fibergeek said previously, as long as the movement of electrolyte is sufficient to keep the hydrogen bubbles from sticking to your work piece, that's all you need.

As long as you are positive the drive shaft is stainless steel, then you won't have a problem. If you have the slightest doubt, use the 700 gph pump with the ceramic shaft. The electrolyte will have no effect on the stainless or ceramic shafts. But if there is a chance that the shaft is steel, then you would contaminate your electrolyte, not to mention dissolving the pump shaft.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2007, 07:35 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
drayegon is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Using a Mag Drive pump for electrolyte circulation

Yes a few of us have been working on it to figure out a way to use things that will not get into the acid. The problem is that agitation is not that good of a deal. Think about it guys if you agitate your tank it kicks the scum off the bottom of the tank and lands it right on top of the nearest surface parallel to the bottom of the tank. Most likely that will be your nice clean part you have been working on to keep clean so hard. The tiny air bubbles do not stir up the bottom sediment in the tank. Also the magnet is made of iron yes some of them are covered in plastic but it gets pinholes in it and then it adds iron to you acid. We even thought of using the magnetic stirrer that chemists use to stir things for a long time. Again moves the acid to much and it then put sediment all over EVERYTING sorry Dray
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2007, 01:10 AM
Metal Finishing Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 833
acidrain is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Using a Mag Drive pump for electrolyte circulation

You realize this is a 3-1/2 year old thread, don't you?
Just to clarify, I used the CHEAPEST of pond pumps with no ill effects at all. The impellers always seemed to be the first to go, but the shafts (ceramic) always lasted, and the iron magnets never became exposed.
Meh, air agitation is good for me.
__________________
Specializing in anodized graphics in Paintball guns.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC4
Copyright © Caswell Inc.