Plating Powder Coating Buffing Anodizing - Caswell Inc. Metal Finishing Forum  

Go Back   Plating Powder Coating Buffing Anodizing - Caswell Inc. Metal Finishing Forum > Anodizing Questions

Notices

Anodizing Questions Discussion board for anodizing questions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2004, 04:40 AM
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 162
NeoMoses
Send a message via AIM to NeoMoses Send a message via Yahoo to NeoMoses
Default Measuring the ano layer with a Micrometer

After hearing about the 720 rule, I decided to see how well my setup would do at trying to grow 0.001" of anodized layer. The most accurate measuring equipment I have available at the moment is a 0-1" micrometer, which can measure to the nearest 0.0001".

I started with an aluminum rod that was 0.2538" diameter, and after 60 minutes of anodizing in a 1:1 electrolyte bath at 12A/ft^2 at 61F, I dyed the part, sealed it, and measured it.

OD after anodizing is 0.2546", a growth of 0.0008" for the diameter, or 0.0004" per side.

However, assuming a TypeII anodized layer is 2/3 above the original surface, 1/3 below, this would yield an anodized layer thickness of about 0.0006".

If the layer is 50% above, 50% below the original surface, this would yield a layer thickness of about 0.0008".

So... my estimate of this layer's thickness is 0.0006"-0.0008". I'll be sending this along with some other test pieces off in the next few weeks for thickness testing with an eddy current thickness gage. We'll see how it correlates.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2004, 12:28 PM
Metal Finishing Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 539
Fibergeek is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I haven't been able to get repeatable results using a micrometer to measure coating thickness. The problem seems to be the normal variation in metal thickness over its surface. We're talking about ten thousanths of an inch here. When you measure different points on the sample you get different readings. +/- 0.001" isn't unusual. Unless the test piece has been precision ground flat and parallel this problem arises.

The micrometer is a Mitutoyu 293-761-30 5 1/2 digit electronic, rated for 0.00005 inch accuracy/resolution. I have confirmed this accuracy using precision gauge blocks. These micrometers are cheaper to buy than you would think, this one is listed in the MSC catalog for $136.00. The gauge blocks cost much more than that.

The ambient temperature and how dry the sample is also effects mechanical thickness measurements. The sample should be BONE dry. BTW, dryness also effects the eddy current meter readings.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2004, 04:40 PM
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 162
NeoMoses
Send a message via AIM to NeoMoses Send a message via Yahoo to NeoMoses
Default

Wow, that's a pretty good deal for that mic! I'll have to pick one up the next time I order from MSC.

I can't wait to see some numbers from the eddy current gage.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © Caswell Inc.