Plating Powder Coating Buffing Anodizing - Caswell Inc. Metal Finishing Forum  

Go Back   Plating Powder Coating Buffing Anodizing - Caswell Inc. Metal Finishing Forum > Anodizing Questions

Notices

Anodizing Questions Discussion board for anodizing questions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2004, 05:03 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 11
Chevalier
Default Dye not absorbing... with pictures!

I have taken a few pics of what i have been anodizing and hope someone can shed a little light on my problem!
Pic 1
http://homepage.eircom.net/~chev2010...8_164738AA.JPG
I ramped the voltage from 0-18 over 2-3 min and left in a 10% bath for 60 min. The part has a yellow tint, won't take any dye(cold or warm), but does seem to have a anodic layer(can be scraped off).

Pic 2
http://homepage.eircom.net/~chev2010...8_164806AA.JPG
Connection out of the acid to be sure it won't fail!, no dye absorbed, there is a anodic layer that can be scraped off. Done using LCD in a 5% bath, final voltage 10.8V @ 4.5asf.

Pic 3
http://homepage.eircom.net/~chev2010...8_164818AA.JPG
Connection out of the acid to be sure it won't fail!, no dye absorbed, there is a anodic layer that can be scraped off with a bit of effort! I ramped the voltage 0-18 over two min, 60 min in the 10% bath.

Pic 4
http://homepage.eircom.net/~chev2010...8_164844AA.JPG
This is what is really bugging me! the parts seen(except the failed one seen earlier) were done using a cheap battery charger when i first tried anodizing things! using an old cloth dye that I found in a cupboard.

I bought some new dye thinking that was the problem, but it doesn't work on these parts either! When anodizing the parts, the room temp was about 6-10 celsius(42-50F). The original parts that did take dye look great!

Any ideas? / anything I didn't mention?
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2004, 08:28 PM
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Just North of Hell
Posts: 76
neilfj
Default

First, are you using Caswell's Dye?
Was the temp of the dye 'room temp' also?
What was the temp of the anodizing tank electrolyte?

I had trouble dyeing at lower temps and found that using the dye at 130-140F solved the problem.

I also also found that the electrolyte at 70-75F improved dye absorption.

If your electrolyte and dye temps are indeed 'room temp', I'd give it another try at the higher temps.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2004, 08:51 PM
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 162
NeoMoses
Send a message via AIM to NeoMoses Send a message via Yahoo to NeoMoses
Default

Take a look at the graph in this thread: http://www.caswellplating.com/bbs/vi...765&highlight=

That is 12 A/ft^2 constant current anodizing in a 1:1 acid:water electrolyte. If you'll notice, the peak voltage is about 15 volts, and doesn't get near that until about 15 minutes into anodizing. Ramping from 0-18 volts in 2-3 minutes is sure to give you a higher current density in the beginning than you are expecting. 18 volts in general sounds a bit high for a 10% acid bath. Try ramping from 0-13 volts in about 5-10 minutes in the same acid bath, also anodizing for 60 minutes. I'd like to see how that turns out.

What type of power supply do you have?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2004, 04:55 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 11
Chevalier
Default

Thanks for the suggestions. When I was trying to dye the parts, I put them in the dye when the dye was at room temp. seeing that this didn't work, I slowly heated the dye with the part still in it, but this didn't do anything!
Neomoses: I'll give 13V a shot and let you know how it goes. I just got a lab supply that does 0-18V and 0-10 Amps.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2004, 11:24 AM
Metal Finishing Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 539
Fibergeek is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Ramping up the voltage in order to keep the current at the desired level mimics the operation of a current source. But you have to monitor the current to do it correctly. If you have a lab power supply, use it in constant current mode. It will ramp the voltage automatically and correctly, you don't have to do anything.

In another attempt to dispell the oldest anodizing old wive's tale:

Many believe (including a suprising number of anodizing professionals) that anodizing in Voltage Mode; ramping up the voltage at startup, forgives the requirement to know the surface area of the work. If you don't know the surface area it is impossible to know the current density. This is Ohm's Law; being a real physical law, it cannot be defeated, if you try to beat it you will be its victim every time. It will only be a matter of degree.
Many pros rely on doing a batch of anodizing of more or less the same size, so that the surface area is (more or less) the same. They have learned by experience that this batch size will have (more or less) a given current density for a given voltage. Also by experience, the particular voltage ramp applied will (more or less) mimic the correct V vs. I curve (Ohm's Law). In cases where these assumptions fall apart, and poor results are obtained, it is blamed on chemistry, alloy composition, etc..
This practice has its origin in the primitive power supplies that were available in anodizing's "stone age", CC mode wasn't practical on a large scale. This is no longer the case due to the advances in industrial electronics over the past 50 years, but old habits die hard.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2004, 05:36 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 11
Chevalier
Default

Well, I tried another part, and it still doesn't work(using CC)! So the next thing that I think can be improved on is heating my acid bath. I'm thinking of buying a fish tank heater(the glass bar type-because they are cheap and the one I am looking at is adjustable from 60-90F). The only problem I can think of is keeping the acid bath mixed so heat won't build up in one spot, I've seen Neomoses system(very nice) but was thinking an air system would be easier to rig up and try, the only problem with the air system is the forming of acid mist(big problem?) and would it actually spread the heat from the heater around the tank?
The air temp. around here is about 41F, so the bath would be way below 72F!!!

Thanks for any input.
Robert
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2004, 06:12 PM
Metal Finishing Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 539
Fibergeek is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

If your ambient air temperature is around 41 deg. F. your electrolyte temp. will be close to it, and way too cold. By all means warm up your electrolyte to 70 -75 deg. F.

If you review NeoMoses' and Neilfj's agitation system threads again; and price out the parts, I think you'll find an aquarium "jet pump" agitation system is as simple and cheap as a suitable aeration system. I doubt that agitation or aeration will make any thermal problems for you on this scale.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2004, 07:19 PM
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 162
NeoMoses
Send a message via AIM to NeoMoses Send a message via Yahoo to NeoMoses
Default

ahh, you're not running at room temps! Yes, that is definately a factor in dyeing. I can see differences in color from 68F to 72F. You need to get that tank temperature up to at least 65F to anodize, 70-72 would be ideal.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2004, 09:49 PM
M_D M_D is offline
Amateur Metal Finisher
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 223
M_D
Default

I looked at the pictures, and in the first one I noticed the pits and the distinct color patterns. It appears the part may be burned (pits and dark uneven color) from too much power and/or time. Your tank temp may be too cold, but with enough excess power I think you can still burn it. I suppose what I see as pits may be simply nicks or other surface imperfections that were present before. If that is the color obtained straight out of the anodizing tank, and it wasn’t burnt, then it may not be cleaned well enough of oxide and other surface contaminants.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pictures of process and equipment non-stick Powder Coating Questions 59 11-04-2008 05:50 PM
New guy posting pictures FireChicken02 Metal Polishing Questions 4 05-09-2005 12:34 PM
Pictures Wanted mcaswell Other Metal Finishing Questions 0 02-02-2003 05:20 PM
Pictures Wanted mcaswell Electroplating Questions 0 02-02-2003 05:19 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © Caswell Inc.