Plating Powder Coating Buffing Anodizing - Caswell Inc. Metal Finishing Forum  

Go Back   Plating Powder Coating Buffing Anodizing - Caswell Inc. Metal Finishing Forum > Anodizing Questions

Notices

Anodizing Questions Discussion board for anodizing questions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2005, 11:16 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2
496hemi
Default Cooling for type III

With a 10 Gal tank what type of cooling systems are being used?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:05 PM
Metal Finishing Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 539
Fibergeek is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

A recirculating chiller, using a mechanical refrigeration unit is popular. These can be configured to provide the mandatory electrolyte agitation as well.
For my 5 gallon "research tank", a 1/4 HP chiller can deal with 300W of power dissipation and hold the electrolyte at 32 deg. F..

Be advised; Caswell Plating and I are not prepared to support Type III anodizing. If you get into trouble, you're on your own.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2005, 06:38 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2
496hemi
Default Thank's for the info

We are going to give it a shot this spring. Just trying to eliminate as many problems as we can before we start. This should be a unique learning experience.

Ralph
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2005, 09:48 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 43
jtsuttle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fibergeek
A recirculating chiller, using a mechanical refrigeration unit is popular. These can be configured to provide the mandatory electrolyte agitation as well.
For my 5 gallon "research tank", a 1/4 HP chiller can deal with 300W of power dissipation and hold the electrolyte at 32 deg. F..

Be advised; Caswell Plating and I are not prepared to support Type III anodizing. If you get into trouble, you're on your own.
Where is a good source for a chiller that is capable of circulating the acid? Right now I have an 18 gallon tank and will upgrading to about 30-50 gallon soon. Everything I have looked at is not acid proof and requires cooling coils to be installed around the outside of the ano tank.
Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2005, 12:27 PM
Metal Finishing Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 539
Fibergeek is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Re-read the third sticky at the top of the page ("quick question about,,,")
on the second page M_D and I describe what we are using and where we got it.

If you want to get into Type III just for grins, that's fine. Its real different than Type II. Be sure to identify and understand all of the equipment requirements first. This can easily get to 3X - 5X more than a Type II setup of the same capacity.

Are you really sure you need Type III? It would be prudent for you to ask why, for your own sake you better have a real good technical answer.

(Hint; if its because you think Type III produces a harder coating you will be dissapointed, it ain't true.)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2005, 02:11 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 43
jtsuttle
Default

Thanks Fibergeek. I've already been doing quite a bit of type III. I was just looking into some better cooling methods.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2005, 03:01 PM
Metal Finishing Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 539
Fibergeek is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

No kidding, I'd like to talk to you offline; trade some technical observations.

One issue I've been struggling with:

How does one know that what was formed is Type III, and not just extra thick Type II ("Type II 1/2") with smaller than usual pores?

I can form coatings that measure 1 to 3 mils thick, have a dark grey to bronze natural color (depending on alloy) and are nasty to dye. But all this alone doesn't prove Type III. What I can't do is measure the coating density (coating measured weight for an accuratly known volume of the coating) this is the only conclusive test from what I have read. A Taber Abrasion Test can give an indirect indication, not that its much easier to do than a density measurement.

I'll just have to muster the nerve (and funds) to have some samples measured by a materials testing lab, and find out what it actually is.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2005, 04:16 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 43
jtsuttle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fibergeek
...One issue I've been struggling with:

How does one know that what was formed is Type III, and not just extra thick Type II ("Type II 1/2") with smaller than usual pores?...
I too have had the same concern. I have no way to prove that it is truely Type III. Basically, I use an additive from a well known supplier and follow the tech guys recommendations. Lucky for me, the parts that I've been doing do not have to pass any sort of testing, they just have to work (and that, they do). I'll dig up my info over the weekend and share what I've got with you. Feel free to contact me: jtsuttle@yahoo.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © Caswell Inc.