![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Anodizing Questions Discussion board for anodizing questions. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi sswee,
Thanks. I am trying to dial my system in as close to optimum as possible, I have been trying to figure out the relationship between temperature and voltage. Seems if I run above 72° I peak to low to soon, if I run 68° I peak to high. My system seem to like 71.257286° When I asked when, I really meant growth wise .1 or .5 or 1mill Thanks Rusty |
|
||||
|
The colder the temp, the more resistance and more voltage to push the amps. To shoot for optimum coating, don't worry about voltage level on the peak but the time of the peak. You want to postpone the peak as long as possible within reason to allow maximum growth. The only time to take concern on the voltage is on a spike or an extremely high peak that would indicate high resistance. ie. burnt connection At 72*, I don't usually go for more than a .5 to.7 mil coating. I've been able to get 1 mil + only by dropping tank temp down to 60* to 64*. This causes voltage to peak a little higher than calculated but not usually more than 2 or 3 volts. In general voltage only varies +-3V max with temp variances on different runs from 60* to 74*. The only problems I've had since I starting using the 720 rule have been due to screw ups in prep. I've dyed 7 different colors so far and no problems with taking good color in about 15 min. Let me know how things go. SS
|
|
|||
|
Hi Swwee,
I am going to mess around and ask the right question eventually. If my tank temp was Ideal and my conections were ideal and my circulation was ideal and my shoes were on the right feet, what thickness of growth would I should I reach peak voltage, Should it peak at .1mill? and then decrease or should it peak at 1mill? Thanks Rusty |
|
||||
|
OK. This is not exactly easy when not in person. If everything was optimum like it is in the perfect world. Aluminum hydroxide(Anodize) can be grown to 1 mil thickness in 720 amp minutes with 1 amp CD. This is where the 720 rule comes from. I understand what you are asking but am not sure that can be answered with a cut and dried answer. I believe theoretically, peak voltage should hit at 1 mil growth. Having learned early in life, in theory and in practice are not always the same. I think voltage peak in relation to coating thickness is variable depending on the combination of the other variables. Fibergeek might need to field this subject in that he has done extensive test runs in more varied CD's under a more controlled evironment than I have. Nomally I hit peak at different times in relation to coating thickness depending on temp. Voltage usually stays at peak an average of 25 min. before starting a .1V per 5 min drop.
|
|
|||
|
Using voltage to gauge conditions can be misleading. If you know what the voltage should be for a given setup, and monitor all conditions, it can help to troubleshoot. If the voltage is suddenly way high (possibly caused by a bad connection or over estimation of amps needed), or even low (under estimation of amps needed), it may point you in the right direction.
The problem with comparing voltages from two individual setups (at the same current density of course) is everything changes the voltage some. A well-deoxidized part will run a different voltage curve compared to an oxidized one. Various alloys change the peak and curve also. Low acid concentration raises voltage, and higher acid concentration lowers it. The effect of general tank temperature was mentioned by sswee. One thing else that is not common knowledge is the agitation level changes the voltage peak and curve, by as much as 2-3 volts and commonly 1.5 volts, at least in our operation. If you want to know why, the sentence before this paragraph contains a clue. (As a note, we run higher current densities for type II which amplify things such as voltage and temperature issues which make them easier too see) I will comment more latter, but thought it would be interesting to see if someone else either knows or guesses what the connection is between agitation and voltage is. It is one reason why the voltage sometimes goes up as time progresses, and other occasions it never does but just drops from the beginning. I’m fairly certain Fibergeek knows, as he has all but said it in other threads. When you add up all the potential variables you can see why a seemingly large variance in voltage shows at times when comparing notes across 2 individual setups. Sometimes it points to a problem and sometimes it doesn’t. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CopyCad & Zinc failure - electrolyte problems? | seanc | Electroplating Questions | 4 | 11-08-2004 09:16 AM |
| Voltage movement | PeterM | Anodizing Questions | 2 | 10-13-2004 04:47 AM |
| Titanium Anodizing | ron423 | Anodizing Questions | 4 | 08-23-2004 04:09 PM |
| Peak voltage question | mudwhump | Anodizing Questions | 6 | 01-14-2004 10:53 PM |