+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Something for you die hard polishers out there to chew on

  1. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    82

    Something for you die hard polishers out there to chew on

    Check out the picture of the piece of aluminum bar stock in this article:

    http://www.nasatech.com/Briefs/Feb01/GSC14147.html

    I've seen several posts throughout this forum in the past about guys who had exhausted all sandpaper grits, gone through all the various compounds, and after it was all said and done there were still tiny scratches that would show up on the part when looked at from the right angle and under the right kind've light. My guess is after looking at this process Nasa used with India Ink, and seeing the end result, maybe this last step might be worth the extra trouble? (I mean heck, if you're already soiled from compound gunk flying around, what's a little ink gonna hurt? )

    Just out of curiosity has anyone here ever experimented with this stuff?

    -Rob-
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  2. Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    belleville michigan
    Posts
    635

    Re: Something for you die hard polishers out there to chew o

    Quote Originally Posted by thesound
    Just out of curiosity has anyone here ever experimented with this stuff?

    -Rob-
    thanks for the link bro.
    i have never heard of this but i will sure research it more. i only wonder where to get the diamond dust and what is the exact process (is it polished by hand, machine or what)? this is very interesting.
    when in doubt polish it out/ why replace it when you can refinish it
    G2 Polishing and Powdercoating
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    957

    Wow, that looks impressive. Thanks for posting it.

    I was just about to post a rant on getting those daggone mico-scratches out, but this article seems to be saying that it's impossible on soft aluminum, using our techinques. It's pretty hard to convince a customer that your work is "perfect" when they see these scratches in bright sunlight (although in reality I haven't had any actual complaints yet - you almost have to be looking for them to see them. I've actually pointed them out and people are like, "so? looks good to me...").

    I wonder what tool would be used with the ink...loose wheels? Some kind of synthetic burnisher? If the article said this I missed it.

    This also explained to me why we get those micro-scratches - the softness of the aluminum. I haven't done enough stainless to know better, but seems to me that this wouldn't be a problem with stainless if hardness is the deciding factor.

    Anybody else done a lot of stainless? Any difference in the micro-scratches?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  4. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    82

    I went into the archives section of that NASA site and downloaded the technical support package that explains in more detail about this:



    Goddard Space Flight Center
    Greenbelt, Maryland 20771
    Technical Support Package
    Process for Polishing Bare Aluminum to High
    Optical Quality
    NASA Tech Briefs
    GSC-14147
    National Aeronautics and
    Space Administration
    Technical Support Package
    for
    PROCESS FOR POLISHING BARE ALUMINUM TO
    HIGH OPTICAL QUALITY
    GSC-14147
    NASA Tech Briefs
    The information in this Technical Support Package comprises the documentation
    referenced in GSC-14147 of NASA Tech Briefs. It is provided under the Commercial
    Technology Program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to make
    available the results of aerospace-related developments considered to have wider
    technological, scientific, or commercial applications. Further assistance is available
    from sources listed in NASA Tech Briefs on the page entitled “NASA Commercial
    Technology Team.”
    Additional information regarding research and technology in this general area may be
    found in a variety of publications available from the NASA Scientific and Technical
    Information (STI) Program Office. You can access the STI Program Office via
    http://www.sti.nasa.gov or as follows:
    NASA STI Help Desk
    NASA Center for AeroSpace Information
    7121 Standard Drive
    Hanover, MD 21076-1320
    Telephone: (301) 621-0390, Fax: (301) 621-0134, E-mail: help@sti.nasa.gov
    NOTICE: This document was prepared under the sponsorship of the National Aeronautics and Space
    Administration. Neither the United States Government nor any person acting on behalf of the United
    States Government assumes any liability resulting from the use of the information contained in this
    document or warrants that such use will be free from privately owned rights. If trade names or
    manufacturers’ names are used in this report, it is for identification only. This usage does not constitute an
    official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.


    Process for Polishing Bare Aluminum to High Optical Quality


    BRIEF ABSTRACT
    A revolutionary new technical advancement in the field of precision aluminum optics
    has permitted high-quality optical “super-polishing” of aluminum substrates.
    Aluminum materials are used worldwide for many applications throughout the
    aerospace and science communities. In the area of optics, aluminum offers numerous
    benefits because of its machinability, light weight, and low cost. Until single point
    diamond turning was developed in the 1970’s, there were no means of producing a
    conventionally polished surface on aluminum that was applicable for optical use.
    Diamond turning is still the main means of satisfying this requirement; however, this
    process is limited because of accuracy limitations of the diamond turning machine.
    Under optimum conditions, diamond turning is limited to producing surface with
    microroughness levels of 50–100 angstroms or greater, and surface figure performance
    of approximately 0.5 to 0.75 of a wave with one wave being 6,328 angstroms.
    The proposed invention is a revolutionary process for the precise optical polishing of
    typical bare aluminum material to a microroughness of less than 6 angstroms RMS,
    while maintaining a surface figure accuracy of 0.125 of a wave peak-to-valley.


    SECTION I – DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM

    In the world of optics, optical instruments, satellites, and interferometry, system performance is
    largely dependent on the actual reflective surface of a given optic. The performance of the optical
    mount and its thermal and mechanical characteristics also influence the performance of the
    component it supports, which in turn, has a very large impact on the entire system performance
    and on the success of the scientific project. Many spacecraft systems utilize aluminum materials
    for structures and in cases of cold/cryogenic use could utilize aluminum mirrors as well. This
    works well in theory, except for the fact that aluminum cannot be readily polished to a smooth
    enough surface to make it an acceptable optic (due to scatter) for UV, IR, and visible spectrum.
    Current technology attempts to resolve this problem by electroplating a thin layer of electroless
    nickel to the entire component surface and then optically polish the plated nickel. The result creates
    a trade-off whereby surface microroughness is decreased while thermal and mechanical stability of
    the optic are severely compromised at all but room temperatures. This is especially true for
    -1- GSC-14147
    aluminum optics that have been light-weighted. Material removal or “pocketing” of the back
    surface of a mirror means that there is several times more surface area to plate than on the front.
    Complicating matters even more is that the mount is usually an integrally machined part of an
    aluminum optic. While these characteristics are great for dimensional requirements and ease of
    design, they create havoc on the optical performance once all surface are evenly plated with nickel.
    Successfully developing a method of optically polishing bare aluminum mirrors to super-smooth
    surface eliminates the need for adding electroless nickel platings, thus eradicating performance
    deterioration resulting from bi-metallic stresses.


    SECTION II – TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION

    The proposed innovation presents a novel and new technique of optical polishing aluminum
    substrate materials in a conventional polishing manner by employing modern techniques with a
    combination of compatible ingredients. Polishing is performed by the precise assembly of
    components to create a working tool-holding apparatus. To start, a select grade of pitch used
    exclusively for optical fabrication is melted and poured onto a cast-iron lap. It is allowed to cool
    and then shaped and grooved according to the optician’s judgement. This is generally referred to
    as “a polisher.” Once complete, it is installed on the machine spindle. The optician then applies the
    appropriate amount of polishing compound and liquid carrier (such as water) to the pitch surface,
    and places the optical component onto the assembly. (These ingredients differ according to the
    material being polished.) The pivot pin is then lowered into a small hole which is pre-drilled in the
    back of the optic and the assembly is set into motion. This method of polishing is called random
    motion polishing. As the machine spindle rotates, the polisher and the floating optic also rotate,
    while the pivot pin passes back and forth over the polisher at a predetermined distance. The
    geometry is such that all points of the polisher and all points of the optic “see” the same amount of
    surface feet per minute of contract, resulting in even material removal. This process is performed
    until an acceptable surface figure and roughness are achieved. This procedure is well established
    for materials such as glass, nickel, stainless steel, and many other glass or metal materials. Until
    now, it has been internationally recognized that there are no known means of conventional
    polishing, or combination of polishing methods which would successfully polish bear aluminum
    materials. (This was a thoroughly discussed topic at the 1999 SPIE conference of cryogenic
    optical systems in San Diego, CA.)
    The significant of the new technique differs from conventional polishing technique described above
    whereby the materials used as a polishing compound and carrier are completely different from that
    -2- GSC-14147
    of normal polishing materials. The innovative technique employs “Black Water-Proof India Ink”
    by KOH-I-NOOR (or equivalent) as a combined compound/lubricant carrier. What makes this so
    successful is that black india ink contains small particles of carbon which are very hard yet small
    enough to provide the correct action between the surfaces of the optic and polisher so as to not
    cause severe scratching or cold material flow. The liquid portion of the ink, which is an oily base,
    provides terrific lubrication while polishing. After years of extensive experimentation with all
    known conventional polishing materials and combinations thereof, this material properly used in a
    conventional manner is the only known substance to produce a successful polish on bare aluminum
    materials.


    SECTION III – UNIQUE OR NOVEL FEATURES

    The uniqueness of the proposed innovation permits superior polishing of bare aluminum materials
    to surface qualities of 5–6 angstroms RMS or less microroughness, with a surface figure error as
    low as one-eighth (0.125) of a wave peak-to-valley. The implementation of this invention in
    NASA alone would result in major cost and schedule savings of instruments currently baselining
    aluminum optical components. As employees of Goddard’s optics branch, the inventors have
    extensive experience in aluminum optics technology, cryogenic operation and characterization and
    system wavefront performance effects of aluminum optics plated with electroless nickel. It is a
    known fact industry-wide that all aluminum mirrors with requirements tighter than that which can
    be delivered by diamond turning MUST have an electroless-nickel plating. Completely eliminating
    this step will mean the following:
    • Drastic savings during fabrication by eliminating electroless nickel plating steps.
    • Less polishing time (nickel is harder to polish).
    • Reduced risk associated with polishing through nickel to the aluminum. This requires that the
    part be stripped of the remaining nickel and re-plated. To do so, the optical surface must again
    be prepared for plating because the stripping procedure etches the aluminum.
    • Drastic performance improvements. It is known that properly heat-treated bare aluminum
    performs well in cryogenic conditions without the nickel plating.
    • Reduced cost of final component characterizations. Plated mirrors that show abnormalities are
    often tested and re-tested to determine the impact on the system performance. If the problem is
    -3- GSC-14147
    identified to be with the nickel plating as is often the case, then the process must be completely
    repeated by stripping the mirror and starting over.
    There are several risks associated with fabricating aluminum mirrors using the prior methods that
    have been discussed. The Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS) which was flown aboard
    Cassini literally spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in a feeble attempt to characterize an
    existing telescope system only to determine that it could not be used because of the bimetallic
    stresses present in the telescope. The aluminum Relay Optics also used in CIRS often drove the
    schedule of the flight instrument build because of problems with cryogenic performance caused by
    the nickel stresses. Most recently, Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) and the Development Cryogenic
    Active Telescope Testbed (DCATT) have experience schedule delays and drastically increased cost
    associated with aluminum mirrors and electroless nickel plating.
    Properly implemented, the proposed innovation will eliminate many of the associated problems
    now common with current aluminum-mirror technology.


    SECTION IV – POTENTIAL COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS

    This new innovation will revolutionize the way industry, the department of defense, NASA and all
    outside optical alignment, fabrication, and test organizations design optical systems and
    components for space flight or ground-based systems. This could result in as much as fiftypercent
    savings to engineering, design, fabrication, and characterization cost of a given assembly
    of components or system.
    The commercial potential for this invention is extremely high and would be very beneficial to
    NASA and its missions as this technology takes form and is brought back into the agency through
    superior aluminum optical components.


    SECTION V – REFERENCE

    Lyons, James, III and Zaniewski, John, “Process for Producing High Quality Optically Polished
    Surfaces on Bare Aluminum Substrates,” GSFC Technology Assessment Report, RTI-98-G016;
    GSC-14147-1, November 3, 1998.
    -4- GSC-14147
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  5. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    957

    Quote Originally Posted by thesound
    I went into the archives section of that NASA site and downloaded the technical support package that explains in more detail about this:
    Thanks. To me, using conventional equipment with India ink presents obvious problems; i.e., throwing the ink off the polishing device.

    I wonder if it would work with something like a rotary cup buff used at _very_ low speed, perhaps using a good bit of pressure as a substitute for speed...

    This definitely bears further investigation and experimentation. I've tried everything from blue compound to talcum powder to kerosene to get rid of those damn scratches.

    The hardness thing still intrigues me. It would explain why chrome doesn't have the scratches.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  6. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    82

    Thanks. To me, using conventional equipment with India ink presents obvious problems; i.e., throwing the ink off the polishing device.

    I wonder if it would work with something like a rotary cup buff used at _very_ low speed, perhaps using a good bit of pressure as a substitute for speed...



    It's feasible if you did it inside of a blasting cabinet. I'm thinking that if you totally submerged a loose cotton wheel in this stuff, to the point that it was sloppy wet, you could keep an adequate amount of ink particles in contact with the surface by periodically adding more pressure and squeezing more out of the buff as if you were wringing out a wet mop. (The wringing effect would continue to get easier as you continued to dilute the ink with distilled water.)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  7. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    957

    Quote Originally Posted by thesound
    It's feasible if you did it inside of a blasting cabinet. I'm thinking that if you totally submerged a loose cotton wheel in this stuff, to the point that it was sloppy wet, you could keep an adequate amount of ink particles in contact with the surface by periodically adding more pressure and squeezing more out of the buff as if you were wringing out a wet mop. (The wringing effect would continue to get easier as you continued to dilute the ink with distilled water.)
    Need to use an enclosure for sure. Maybe even do it in a tray of some kind where you keep the surface flooded with the stuff.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  8. customandsound Guest

    All my polish look's that way..
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  9. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    957

    Quote Originally Posted by customandsound
    All my polish look's that way..
    I hear ya!
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

  10. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    75

    My partner at work used to make paper products at a plant here in town a few years back. I was telling him about this new process and he said they used to make their own carbon paper by using India ink and that he thought the roller that was always in contact with the ink was a chrome roller. They had to change out the roller after a while and discovered it wasn't chrome, just plain carbon steal. He said now he understands why it was so shiny. Just thought I'd share that with ya'll.

    Steve
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
    Share with Facebook

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC1 PL1