![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Metal Polishing Questions Discussion Board For metal polishing questions. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
i was gonna ask about tumblers.SO am i right in thinking you buy the right media, buy one of these tumblers, put in your peices, say small aliminium engine parts, put in your media and other stuff, turn it on and it will come out polished?
|
|
|||
|
I don’t think you can achieve a mirror finish or even get close in a tumbler.
It’s good for de-burring and will leave a uniform finish suitable for industrial anodizing, paint, or powder coat. I don’t like polishing parts that have been tumbled and I hate it when they have been blasted with sand or any other media. I find that tumbled parts get micro pits from electrolysis and require more sanding. I also notice it is harder to clean / degrease the areas that don’t get sanded and polished. Not that I am an expert on tumbling, but I have operated them and had to polish plenty of tumbled parts from several different sources and the results have always been much the same with the occasional “these parts are ruined” thrown in. |
|
|||
|
Whenever different metals are placed in a conductive liquid you create a battery. If you connect these pieces of metal together, current will flow. The current will be removing metal from one of the metal pieces = "electrolysis".
Keep in mind that electrolysis that takes place in a tumbler is minimal. I have had the opportunity to polish parts from the same batch before and after tumbling. The ones that get tumbled long enough for the de-burring to occur always have the micro pits. These pits are not visible until you have obtained a quality finish close to or suitable for optical imagery. So many polishers will never even notice. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Next question: What materials are you polishing to suitability for optical imagery? |
|
|||
|
I could tell you, but then I would have to kill you!
J/K SS and aluminum. Mostly SS for the medical industry. Some of the equipment uses metal mirrors, and in some cases it is experimental or classified and I have no clue who is using it for what. ![]() |
|
|||
|
Interesting. As far as aluminum, there's an article somewhere on here re the aerospace/atronomy people not being able to get aluminum to optical quality and experimenting with india ink as a finishing media. Sounds messy, huh?
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
These pores also can be the limiting factor in achieving the quality of finish needed for optics. You some times here me say the limits of the metal, mostly when referring to polished castings. Heavy porosity = dull. As long as I am on the subject of porosity and gasses I will say that I never recommend chroming aluminum for just that reason as well as a few other reasons. However if money is of no concern and ease of maintenance is top concern, then chrome away. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vibratory Aluminum Polishing | Night_Sky | Metal Polishing Questions | 4 | 02-17-2006 11:42 AM |
| on the subject of vibratory polishers | dagobert | Powder Coating Questions | 4 | 01-29-2005 07:48 AM |
| Finishing metals with vibratory tumbler | rx7carl | Other Metal Finishing Questions | 6 | 07-23-2004 08:57 PM |
| Using a vibratory tumbler to refinish stainless golf clubs? | kenlancaster | Other Metal Finishing Questions | 1 | 12-10-2003 10:31 AM |
| Vibratory finishing: Continued total failure plus a new clue | xiphmont | Metal Polishing Questions | 2 | 10-23-2002 02:47 AM |