Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quick question on "old" ano method......

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sid03
    started a topic Quick question on "old" ano method......

    Quick question on "old" ano method......

    What was the old anodizing bath mixture for high current(12ASF) anodizing? Was it 1:1? I just want to double check. Thanks!

    [Moderator Edit: Made Sticky because this thread contains a TON of fantastic information about troubleshooting an anodizing system. ]

  • KevinB
    replied
    I know this is an old sticky, but using specific gravity for measure sulfuric concentrations is only accurate when you are making a fresh bath and you know exactly what is in the bath. Once the bath is made and has been running, I can put any number of different things in the bath that effect the S.G. (milk, alcohol, sugar, etc). None of these will change the total titratable acid however. Titration is the only way to accurately measure how much acid is in the bath period.

    Leave a comment:


  • sswee
    replied
    Re: Quick question on "old" ano method......

    I didn't mean to offend. I had asked the same question when I first started and was told it wasn't an accurate way to check acid concentration. I am fixing to mix more acid for a larger tank and I'll have to check out the s.g. of different ratios.
    SS

    Leave a comment:


  • sage
    replied
    Re: Quick question on "old" ano method......

    Actually this wasn't difficult at all. Sorry I asked.

    I made two very small new batches of acid to the 3:1 and 2:1 ratios specified by Caswell for thier old and new LCD processes. "Battery acid" as I find out now is pretty standard at 19.2% by volume, 35% by weight H2SO4.

    I then measured the specific gravity (s.g.) of the two samples with a cheap Hydrometer available at any auto supply place.

    Just so eveyone is aware, the Caswell LCD solution which is a 3:1 mixture of battery acid and water and is apparently 4.8% by volume H2SO4 measures about 1075 s.g..
    The original Caswell solution which I gather was 6.4% H2SO4 by volume and a 2:1 water acid measures 1100 s.g.

    To back up these test results I found the data on the internet for sulphuric acid from Sulco Chemicals, an acid manufacturer. They listed various acid percentages against their s.g. The s.g measurements I made coresponed pretty closely to the percentages I new I had and their data.

    Now it was a simple matter of returning my acid to the 1075 s.g by adding water which means it is back to the LCD spec of 4.8% by volume and 3:1 mixture.

    Simple and cheap.

    Sage

    Leave a comment:


  • sswee
    replied
    Re: Quick question on "old" ano method......

    caswellsage,
    The easiest cheapest way is to measure out your electrolyte and bring the volume back to the original level mixed with distilled or RO water. The only other way to check acid concentration is titration or mix a fresh batch. I know it's not what you wanted to hear but I don't know of any other ways.
    SS

    Leave a comment:


  • sage
    replied
    Re: Acid Concentrations

    Can some one please translate the 1:3 or 10% or grams per litre acid measurements to something I can easily measure like specific gravity. I have used my acid bath for quite some time and I know I've lost a lot of water through evaporation. Knowing that the original mixture was 3:1 "battery acid" - which I assume is a variable itself - doesn't help me now and I don't have any sofisticated equipment to measure grams/litre. Can someone relate these measurements to specific gravity which anyone can measure with a simple $3.00 car battery hydrometer? If there is a conversion formula I'd appreciate knowing it since I'd like to experiment with diffferent concentrations in my process in the future.

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Fibergeek
    replied
    You find that its not hard to set the angle of the holes so that the jets of electrolyte don't break the surface. I'm recirculating 5 gallons at 420 GPH that's 7 GPM, it takes 43 seconds to cycle all of my electrolyte. The surface looks dead calm, but 1 inch below and to the bottom its really moving. I have no bubbles sticking to the work or the cathode ever.

    I have many anodization curves for 1100, 2024, 6061, and 7075, at ASFs from LCD through 21 ASF. I'm not at liberty to share them until early July.

    I'll cheat a little and just verbally describe a few.

    These were 90 minute anodizations to grow "Type II 1/2" coatings up to 3 mils. thick, not what you would want.

    18 ASF, 70.4 deg. F. 1:1 electrolyte, very accurately instrumented.

    2024 started (+3 minutes) at 1.22 Ohms/sq,ft., and gently sloped downward to 1.05 Ohms/ sq.ft. at +90 minutes. The final coating thickness was 17um (0.7 mils) there were signs of dissolution (chalky residue) but dyeing was fine.

    Contrast this to 6061; same ASF, temp., time, and electrolyte:

    This rose rapidly to 1.10 Ohms/sq.ft. at +5 min. they continued to rise at a slower rate to 1.62 Ohms/sq.ft at +90 min. The thickness was 70um (2.75 mils.) no dissolution signs, dyeing also excellent.

    I didn't provide voltages as these would be meaningless since the size of your work is so different than mine. You can calculate what the voltages would be for a given surface area.

    PAR was not evident, I have found out with a lot of testing that it only works with weak electrolyte, and is most visible at LCD ASF ranges, it will not be visible at all with racking.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid03
    replied
    So it wasnt too much for the 15gallon? I dont really want acid splashin everywhere.


    Fibergeek- You have any examples of 2000 series ano curve? How will it act when it hits PAR, start to rise?

    Leave a comment:


  • M_D
    replied
    I forgot to mention that I used it in a 15 gallon tank and it worked fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid03
    replied
    I imagine that would be a touch much for my tank then, dont you think? They make so many models.....guess ill have to read up and see what the differences are

    Leave a comment:


  • M_D
    replied
    This is the one I have, and it works well in a 55 gallong tank.

    Little Giant Chemical pump
    3-MD-HC series
    1/12 HP Open Fan cooled
    Intermittent Liquid Temp: 200F
    Specific gravity: 1.1
    Intake: 3/4 FNPT
    Discharge: 1/2 MNPT
    Glass-filled Ryton Magnet Housing
    Glass-filled Ryton Volute
    Glass-filled Ryton Impeller
    Viton O-ring
    Ceramic Thrust Washers
    Ceramic Shaft
    Weight (lbs) 8.8


    They have several grades, you need one for high corrosives. I think I paid about $150 each at Grainer. I found a cheaper place the other day, about $135-$140 if I remember correctly, but I can't seem to find it now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid03
    replied
    looks like the orings in those little giant pumps will be effected by the acid, and the ceramagnet isnt listed under the 0-10% sulfuric acid micture, but has a low rating under the higher acid mixture.

    My ano tank is 15 gallon, will that pump be enough?

    Leave a comment:


  • M_D
    replied
    The first pump I used was one just like NeoMoses used. I ran it for a little while, and had problems with the anodizing that I assumed was from the grease. So I cleaned it all out, and it ate itself up shortly after that.

    Then I bought a Little Giant Pump similar to the one Fibergeek mentioned. I cleaned the grease out of it before the first use and it has run hundreds of hour so far. I haven't inspected it for a while, but last time I did it looked good and didn't appear to be wearing excessively.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fibergeek
    replied
    Look under magnetic drive pumps. There is a chemical resistance chart, and all components and what they're made of is listed in the data sheets.
    The 10% sulfuric acid line on the chart will cover all usable concentrations of anodizing electrolyte.

    I think it was M_D (?) who initially had some problems, I believe he now has things sorted out. These pumps can be quickly disassembled without tools for cleaning. There was some silicone (?) grease inside as a preservative, I cleaned it out with a paper towel. You are not supposed to run these pumps dry for any length of time, that will damage them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid03
    replied
    so nothing in those pumps or chillers are anything but Ti or plastic(that the fluid contacts)? Where is that pump located on the little giant site?

    I remember that somebody had a problem with grease coming out of the pump and then I believe the pump burned up.......was that just a fluke?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X